Security Protocols in High-Volume Mountain Venues
Ski resort villages often function as dense entertainment districts, yet they frequently lack the security infrastructure of an urban nightlife zone. When thousands of guests descend from the mountain to crowd into aprés-ski venues, the potential for friction is high. We analyze whether the venue maintained adequate security staffing ratios to monitor the crowd or if they allowed a ‘self-policing’ environment that led to foreseeable altercations, sexual assaults, or unmanaged aggressive behavior.
Identifying Security Failures
Improper Ejection Protocols: Evaluating if security ejected intoxicated or vulnerable guests into freezing conditions without ensuring safe transport (a “Duty to Care” violation).
Staffing Ratios: Comparing the number of security personnel on duty against the venue’s capacity and industry standards for high-volume alcohol environments.
Incident Response Times: Analyzing radio logs to determine if security delayed intervening in a known altercation, allowing it to escalate into significant injury.
“Hands-Off” Policies: Reviewing if the venue instructed staff to avoid physical intervention even when guest safety was actively threatened.
Auditing the "Chain of Command"
In security litigation, the ‘Post Orders’ (written instructions for guards) are critical. We compare what the security manual says should happen against what actually occurred. By synchronizing CCTV footage with security radio dispatch logs, we can identify specific failures: the guard who was on their phone during a fight, the manager who failed to call police, or the ‘ghost patrol’ that was logged but never happened. We turn operational data into proof of negligence.
our team
Preston Rideout
Expert Witness
Ryan Dahlstrom
Expert Witness
Silver Gordon
Expert Witness
Ski Resort Alcohol
Liability FAQ
We provide objective, data-driven evaluations of beverage service operations within mountain environments. Our analysis determines if a venue adhered to industry standards or if systemic failures in oversight contributed to a specific alcohol-related incident.
Liability often hinges on "Foreseeability." If the aggressor was visibly intoxicated, aggressive, or had been causing problems for 30 minutes prior to the fight, and security did nothing to remove them, the venue may be liable for the resulting assault.
Generally, no. Ejecting a vulnerable, intoxicated person into life-threatening cold without a coat or safe transportation can constitute gross negligence. Venues have a duty to avoid placing the patron in a "worse position" than when they found them.
This is common in resorts. We audit training records to see if the guards held valid security licenses or certifications (like TIPS/moAB). Using untrained staff to manage volatile crowds is a direct failure of management oversight.
Request Ski Resort Expert Assistance
Expert witness support is available for matters involving negligent security and guest supervision in ski resort environments. Assistance focuses on staffing levels, incident response, and ejection protocols.
Objective expert witness support for alcohol-related injury matters nationwide.
Alcohol Injuries provides professional expert witness support in matters involving alcohol-related injury incidents. Work focuses on incident circumstances, operational context, impairment factors, and injury causation analysis relevant to civil litigation and legal proceedings.
Alcohol Injuries © 2025 All rights reserved.