Attorneys often ask how the evaluation process works and what support they can expect. These answers provide clarity on case review procedures, documentation needs, timelines, and expert involvement during litigation.
Yes, frequently. While clubs often claim “Social Host” immunity because alcohol is “inclusive” or billed monthly, forensic analysis of the club’s financial structure often reveals that alcohol is a commercial transaction funded by dues, minimum spend requirements, or event fees. If the club employs professional staff and facilitates the consumption of alcohol as a business benefit, we can often demonstrate that they are subject to the same Duty of Care as a commercial bar.
Unmonitored “Honor Bars” or locker systems are a significant liability risk. Clubs often argue these are self-service amenities, but if the club provides the facility, glassware, and stock while failing to supervise consumption—especially in venues where driving is required to leave—this can be framed as systemic negligence. We analyze whether the club removed reasonable safety barriers (like bartenders) to prioritize member convenience over safety.
Club bylaws and “House Rules” often establish a Standard of Care that is higher than state law. For example, if a club’s internal policy mandates the immediate expulsion of any member using profanity or showing signs of intoxication, and staff failed to enforce this rule prior to an incident, the club has voluntarily violated its own safety standards. We use these documents to prove the club ignored its own definition of safety.
Yes. In private clubs, the power dynamic is unique: the customer is often the “boss.” If we can demonstrate a coercive employment environment—where staff feared retaliation or job loss for cutting off an influential Board member or donor—the liability shifts from the individual bartender’s error to the club’s operational management. We look for patterns of management failing to back up staff in previous disputes.
We provide objective expert analysis for both plaintiff and defense counsel. For defense, we evaluate whether the club’s policies and staff actions met industry standards for reasonable care and foreseeability. For plaintiffs, we identify operational failures in supervision, training, and enforcement that contributed to the injury. Our testimony is grounded in established industry protocols, making it defensible from either side.
708 Poplar St, Greenwood, MS